Higher education is in a state of rapid change.
Political shifts, funding uncertainties and mounting public scrutiny are forcing leaders to reassess policies, messaging and financial strategies.
Across campuses, institutional leaders are asking tough questions and urgently seeking solutions to protect their missions and serve their communities.
In a recent Chronicle of Higher Education webinar, higher ed leaders voiced pressing concerns about how to navigate these challenges while staying true to their core values. This article references this webinar, along with insights from Evidence In Motion's (EIM) academic team.
Here's what they're asking and how they can respond.
How Can Institutions Approach Inclusion Policies?
As legal and political pressures on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) grow, many institutions are adapting their language and framing.
Instead of DEI, universities are emphasizing "student success," "equitable access" and "campus climate" to align with their missions while sidestepping political flashpoints.
"Some institutions are revisiting their admissions practices, emphasizing holistic review processes that consider the full context of a student's experiences rather than relying solely on traditional metrics like GPA and test scores," said Dr. Melissa Randazzo, PhD, CCC-SLP, academic officer of speech-language pathology at EIM.
But shifting language alone doesn't erase the risks for vulnerable populations.
Although disability inclusion has improved in campus facilities, learning environments and digital tools, there is limited data on how dismantling DEI initiatives might affect people with disabilities.
Institutions that embed accessibility into curriculum, facilities and services may be better positioned to sustain inclusion efforts despite policy rollbacks.
“Incorporating Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles into teaching and assessment can further support inclusion by creating flexible learning environments that accommodate the variability of all students from the start,” said Dr. Randazzo, PhD.
How Are Institutions Responding to Policy Changes?
Responses vary. Some institutions tread carefully due to funding risks and legal concerns. Others see an opportunity to clarify values and refine strategies.
Clear, proactive communication is key. Leaders are focusing on transparency, ensuring faculty, students and external stakeholders understand what's changing and what remains constant.
The most effective responses reinforce institutional missions while adapting to shifting realities.
What Are the Implications of Cuts to Federal Research Funding?
Proposed reductions to agencies like the National Institute of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation (NSF) could disrupt faculty research, student opportunities and institutional budgets.
Funding cuts threaten initiatives supporting underrepresented groups in STEM and may slow scientific progress. Universities are responding in three ways:
- Advocacy and storytelling: Institutions like the University of Wisconsin-Madison are launching campaigns to highlight research impact.
- Short-term financial strategies: Some universities are investing in research infrastructure, seeking philanthropic support and exploring public-private partnerships to supplement resources.
- Strategic Gaps: Many institutions acknowledge they lack a long-term financial strategy to fully offset federal cuts.
Why Are Some Institutions Hesitant to Speak Out?
Political risk, donor expectations and board dynamics influence how and whether leaders publicly address controversial issues.
Some campuses engage in active advocacy, while others take a more measured approach.
Despite these challenges, many institutions recognize that clear, values-driven messaging is essential to maintaining stakeholder trust and defending higher education's broader societal role.
What Happens if the Education Department Is Restructured?
The U.S. Department of Education oversees accreditation and student aid programs. Efforts to dismantle it would require congressional approval and face major legal and logistical hurdles.
Accreditation bodies worry that political interference could erode quality assurance. While changes remain speculative, institutions should monitor developments and prepare for potential shifts in federal oversight.
Are Pell Grants and TRIO Programs at Risk?
Yes. Funding cuts could significantly impact first-generation, low-income and underrepresented students. Institutions are responding by:
- Implementing budget contingency plans: Some are freezing hiring and reassessing spending.
- Exploring alternative funding: Universities are expanding institutional aid and seeking new partnerships.
- Advocating through national associations: Many are lobbying for continued federal support.
How Are Institutions Supporting Faculty and Staff?
Leaders are taking steps to address uncertainty and maintain institutional stability:
- Working groups: Williams College launched teams to assess policy threats and institutional responses.
- Open discussions: NYU faculty held town halls to examine policy impacts and call for stronger institutional support.
- Legal advocacy: Higher ed organizations are challenging executive orders restricting DEI programs.
The Road Ahead
Higher ed leaders are navigating a complex and fast-changing environment, shaped by political shifts, financial pressures and evolving student needs.
Success in this moment will depend on thoughtful planning, adaptable strategies and clear, consistent communication.
While there is no one-size-fits-all approach, institutions that stay mission-focused and proactively align operations, messaging and student support with today’s realities will be better equipped to lead through uncertainty.
Now more than ever, solutions that balance agility with long-term resilience can help institutions meet the moment and shape what comes next.